Livestock Research for Rural Development 1 (1) 1989 | Citation of this paper |
Development of feeding systems for rabbits and guinea pigs, based on sugar cane juice and tree foliages
A Solarte*
CIPAV, Convenio Interinstitucional para la Producción Agropecuaria en el Valle del Río Cauca, AA7482, Cali, Colombia
* IFS grantee (Research grant No: B/1126-1)
Summary
Three experiments were carried out on the feeding of sugar cane juice (preserved with either sodium benzoate or sodium metasilicate) and tree foliage (from Erythrina glauca and E peppigiana) to rabbits and guinea pigs.
The first experiment aimed to assess the acceptability of foliage from Leucaena leucocepahala and from E glauca as sources of protein to supplement the carbohydrates in the cane juice. Two growing rabbits had free access to one of these foliages and to preserved sugar cane juice. After 11 days intake of the Leucaena decreased markedly and it was replaced by Erythrina. During a further period of 100d, intakes were normal and there were no digestive problems. Intake averaged 91 g DM/d, of which 46% corresponded to the cane juice.
In the second trial, five New Zealand White male rabbits (initial weight 1240 g) were fed the cane juice and Erythrina foliage for 56 days. Average weight gains were 11.5 g/d. Intake of Erythrina increased during this period from 50% of the diet DM in the first week to 65% at the end of the trial.
The third trial was with growing guinea pigs fed comfrey (Sphytum peregrinum) foliage free choice and either (i) King grass and a commercial concentrate; (ii) derinded cane stalk and protein supplement; (iii) derinded cane stalk and foliage from E poeppigiana; or (iv) sugar cane juice and protein supplement. There were no digestive problems and no differences in growth rates (5 to 8 g/d) among the treatments.
Data are given on protein content and dry matter digestibilities (rumen nylon bag method) for a number of foliages considered to have potential value for feeding to rabbits and guinea pigs.
Key words: Rabbits, guinea pigs, sugar cane juice, forage trees, derinded sugar cane stalk, Erythrina spp.
Introduction
In Colombia, as in many other developing countries, a considerable sector of the population suffers nutritional deficiencies, especially in proteins of animal origin (milk, meat and eggs). The major factor limiting a higher consumption is the cost of these products, mainly because production systems are highly dependent on imported inputs, and therefore are not attractive to resource- poor producers.
Sugar cane juice has been used successfully in the fattening of pigs as the principal source of carbohydrates, replacing completely the cereal grains normally used for this purpose (Fermin et al 1984; Mena 1984). Cane juice has also been used experimentally in fattening of chickens, on the same basis as with pig feeding, giving the juice free choice together with restricted amounts of a protein supplement (Posso y Preston 1989).
The concept of fractionating sugar cane into highly digestible carbohydrate (the juice) for monogastric animals, and residual fibre for small ruminants, is particularly appropriate as a technological basis for intensive family farm systems (Solarte and Preston 1989).
Rabbits and guinea pigs fit well into the family farm concept, and could be the major source of animal protein for consumption by the family, the products from the other animal species being sold for cash income. As outlined by Cheeke (1986), these small herbivores have some specific advantages such as:
The above features are applicable both to guinea pigs and to rabbits. The former are an important livestock species in the South of Colombia, in Ecuador, in Peru and in Bolivia. Charbonneau (1988) reported there were 22 million guinea pigs in Peru, which are raised for domestic consumption accounting for up to 95% of the per caput protein intake in the Andean region. They are also bartered for other basic foods such as rice.
Trial 1
Materials and methods
This experiment was done in the experimental station of the Department of Biology of the University del Valle. The principal objective was to observe the adaptation of growing rabbits to a diet based on sugar cane juice and tree foliage.
Four rabbits of the New Zealand White breed, weighing 1800 g, were housed in individual wire metal cages. Two animals were offered fresh leaves of Leucaena leucocephala; the others were given leaves from the legume tree Erythrina glauca. Each rabbit had free access to the leaves and to fresh (or refrigerated) sugar cane juice which had been preerved with sodium benzoate (1.5 g/litre). The forages were harvested and held at ambient temperature for 24h prior to feeding. Water was also freely available.
Results and discussion
The rabbits allocated to the Leucaena treatment ate this forage well during the first days of the trial. However, by the 11th day of the trial, intake had fallen dramatically and it was decided to substitute the leucaena with Erythrina leaves, which were being consumed normally by the other two rabbits. Similar difficulties were encountered by Harris and Cheeke (1981) and Ramchurn (1978) when they attempted to replace a commercial cereal-based concentrate with high levels of Leucaena meal.
Table 1: Fresh and dry matter intakes by growing rabbits given free access to sugar cane juice and foliage from the legume tree Erythrina glauca (Mean values and SD) | |||
Cane juice (ml/day) | Erythrina foliage (g/day) | Total (g/day) | |
Fresh matter | 235 ± 41 | 198 ± 40 | |
Dry matter | 42 ± 7 | 49 ± 10 | 91 |
As % of diet | 46 | 54 | 100 |
All the rabbits continued to consume cane juice and leaves of Erythrina during a period of 100 days. There were no symptoms of digestive or metabolic upsets. Intakes of the juice and tree legume are given in Table 1. Each contributed about half of the total diet dry matter.
Trial 2
Materials and methods
This trial aimed to establish performance levels of rabbits fed the diets developed as a result of the observations made in Trial 1.
Five rabbits were used (New Zealand White) with a mean initial weight of 1240 g. Feeding and housing procedures were the same as in Trial 1, except that sodium metasilicate was used to preserve the juice at a concentration of 5 g/litre. Feed intakes were recorded daily and liveweights weekly during an experimental period of 56d. The trial was carried out in the Hacienda Arizona, Jamundi, Valle.
Results and Discussion
Table 2: Liveweights and feed intakes of growing rabbits given free access to sugar cane juice and foliage from Erythrina glauca | |||||
Live | Weight | ----------------- Feed Intakes ----------------- | |||
Week | weight (g) | gain (g) | Juice (ml/d) | Foliage (g/d) | D.M. (% of LW) |
Initial | 1244 | - | - | - | - |
1 | 1268 | 3.4 | 133 | 87 | 4.2 |
2 | 1333 | 9.3 | 142 | 159 | 5.7 |
3 | 1424 | 13.0 | 145 | 180 | 5.8 |
4 | 1507 | 11.8 | 148 | 195 | 5.8 |
5 | 1606 | 14.0 | 135 | 215 | 5.7 |
6 | 1669 | 8.5 | 156 | 277 | 6.9 |
7 | 1765 | 13.7 | 205 | 265 | 6.8 |
8 | 1895 | 18.6 | 223 | 336 | 7.7 |
Mean values | 11.5 | 160 | 214 | 6.0 | |
Final liveweights averaged 1900 g giving a mean daily growth rate of 12 g; rates of feed intake and growth improved as the trial progressed and this was related with an apparent adaptation to the Erythrina foliage, intake of which tripled during the period of the trial (Table 2). The contribution of the Erythrina to the total diet increased from 50 to 65% as the trial progressed.
Trial 3
It was decided to use Guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) for this trial on the basis of their apparently greater rusticity, compared with rabbits, and their popularity as human food in much of Colombia. The animals used (n = 32; mean age 12 weeks) were crossbreds derived from indigenous (Criollo) and Peruvian strains. The trial was carried out at the Instituto Mayor Campesino (IMCA), Buga, Valle.
Contrasting sources of carbohydrate and protein were compared in a growth trial lasting 56 days. The treatments were: King grass, Comfrey (Sphytum peregrinum) foliage and 50 g/day of a cereal-rich concentrate (Control); chopped sugar cane stalk (from which the rind had been removed previously), fresh Comfrey leaves and 15 g/day of a protein supplement (40% protein) formulated for growing pigs; chopped derinded cane stalk, Comfrey leaves and leaves from the legume tree Erythrina poeppigiana; Sugar cane juice, Comfrey leaves and 15 g/day of the protein concentrate used in the second treatment. In all cases the foliages, derinded cane stalk and cane juice were given on a free choice basis. One group of two males and one group of two females were allocated to each treatment according to a 4 x 2 factorial design with two repetions.
The feeds were introduced gradually during a period of two weeks before initiating measurements of intake and growth.
Results and Discussion
The intakes of the different diet components are given in Table 3. Growth and conversion rates are given in Table 4.
Table 3: Intake of the different components of the diet given to growing guinea pigs | ||||
Treatment | Fresh matter (g/d) |
Dry matter (g/d) |
Protein (g/d) |
Proportion of total protein (%) |
Control | ||||
Grass | 173 | 35 | 2.8 | 31 |
Comfrey | 41 | 6 | 1.3 | 15 |
Concentrate | 36 | 32 | 5.4 | 54 |
Total | 250 | 73 | 11.5 | |
Derinded cane and protein supp | ||||
Derinded cane | 101 | 31 | 0.0 | 0 |
Comfrey | 74 | 11 | 2.3 | 35 |
Supplement | 14 | 13 | 5.0 | 65 |
Total | 189 | 55 | 7.3 | |
Derinded cane and Erythrina | ||||
Derinded cane | 117 | 35 | 0.0 | 0 |
Comfrey | 84 | 13 | 2.9 | 50 |
Erythrina leaves | 88 | 18 | 2.9 | 50 |
Total | 289 | 66 | 5.8 | |
Cane juice and protein supp | ||||
Cane juice | 117 | 23 | 0.0 | 0 |
Comfrey | 90 | 14 | 3.4 | 40 |
Supplement | 15 | 14 | 5.4 | 60 |
Total | 232 | 51 | 8.8 | |
Highest intakes of dry matter were encountered for animals on the control diet; the lowest intake was recorded on cane juice and protein supplement. Protein intake was highest on the control diet and least for the derinded stalk and Erythina diet.
Table 4: Growth and feed intakes of guinea pigs fed diets derived from sugar cane | ||||
Control | Derinded stalk and suppl |
Derinded stalk and Erythrina |
Cane juice and Suppl |
|
Liveweight (g) | ||||
Initial | 538 | 478 | 471 | 478 |
Final | 772 | 628 | 613 | 662 |
Daily gain | 8.5 | 5.3 | 5 | 6.6 |
Feed intakes (g/d) | ||||
Dry matter | 73 | 55 | 66 | 50 |
Protein | 9.5 | 7.4 | 5.8 | 8.6 |
Feed conversion | 8.7 | 12.8 | 15.7 | 6.9 |
Mean growth rates did not differ significantly among treatments but tended to be less for the derinded cane stalk treatments than for the control and cane juice treatments. Growth rate was significantly related with intake of protein (r5 = 0.83) but not with dry matter (r5 = 0.21).
Trial 4: Dry matter degradabilities of tree forages
Materials and Methods
This trial consisted of observations on the degradabilities of different tree foliages and other species, using the rumen "nylon bag" method of Orskov et al (1980).
Results and Discussion
Content of protein, and dry matter degradabilities of dry matter after 12 and 24 h in the rumen, are set out in Table 5. Based on this evaluation and on local availability, the most promising species which might be chosen for further studies for feeding to rabbits and guinea pigs are the Erythrina spp, Gliricidia sepium and Trichantera gigantea.
Table 5: Protein content and dry matter degradabilities (rumen bag method) for some forage trees found commonly in Colombia | |||
Species | Protein content | Degradability of dry matter | |
(% in DM) | % in 12 hr | % in 24 hr | |
Legumes | |||
Erythrina poeppigiana | 16.1 | 45.8 | 54.4 |
Erythrina glauca | 19.5 | 45.8 | 56.0 |
Erythrina edulis | 19.5 | 40.6 | 49.6 |
Inga spectabilis | 15.7 | 29.2 | 34.4 |
Sesbania sesban | 18.9 | 6.8 | 14.0 |
Gliricidia sepium | 24.0 | 36.0 | 50.0 |
Cassia grandis | 14.2 | ||
Cassia siamea | 11.7 | ||
Mimosa farnesiana | 17.8 | ||
Pseudosamanea guachapele | 21.4 | ||
Crotalaria juncea | 29.0 | ||
Dioclea cericea | 11.2 | ||
Non-legume | |||
Amaranthus dubius | 26.5 | 36.2 | 57.2 |
Renealmia occidentalis | 12.7 | 28.2 | 36.6 |
Gmelina arborea | 17.3 | 44.2 | 52.0 |
Trichantera gigantea | 16.7 | 52.4 | 60.2 |
Pachira acuatica | 10.3 | ||
General discussion
The preliminary findings reported here indicate that it appears to be technically feasible to feed rabbits and guinea pigs with sugar cane juice and tree foliages as sources respectively of carbohydrate and protein. Growth rates obtained with rabbits on this diet were lower than has been reported with nutritionally optimum dietary regimes based on high level use of cereal-rich concentrates (see Cheeke 1987). However, it is believed that performance can be improved by selection of appropriate tree species, and/or by physical or chemical processing, so as to secure material with high palatability and increased availability of protein.
It is proposed to concentrate efforts initially on the use of the foliage from Trichantera gigantea. Although this species is not leguminous, it is nevertheless demonstrating excellent agronomic attributes of high forage yield, wide adaptability to varied soil conditions and elevations and apparently high disease resistance (E Murgueitio, personal communication). Of equal importance is the fact that the foliage from this tree is of high digestibility (Table 5) and is being consumed by pigs in quantities sufficient to balance the carbohydrates provided by sugar cane juice when both are given on a free choice basis (Mejia 1989).
Acnowledgements
These experiments were carrried out with the financial assistance of the International Foundation for Science (Research Grant No: B/1126-1) and the collaboration of Dr Graciela Valderrama de Dias, Biology Department, University del Valle; Alfonso Madriñan, owner of the Hacienda Arizona, Jamundi; Padre José Alejando Aguilar, Director of the Instituto Mayor Campesino (IMCA), Buga, Valle; and the post graduate students of CIPAV.
References
Charbonneau R 1988 Fiesta para seis; un cuy. Revista El CIID, Ottawa, Canada
Cheeke P R 1986 Potentials of rabbit production in tropical and subtropical agricultural systems. Journal of Animal Science 63:1581-1586
Cheeke P R 1987 Rabbit Feeding and Nutrition. Academic Press: San Diego, California
Fermin D, Fermin R, Pina A and Mena A 1984 Sugar cane juice as a substitute for maize and molasses in diets for fattening pigs. Tropical Animal Production 9:271-274.
Harris D J y Cheeke P R 1981 Digestibility of leucaena leaf meal in rabbits. Leucaena Research Report. 2 : 73 Council for Agricultural Planning and Development. Taipei. Taiwan.
Mejia C 1989 Observaciones sobre el uso de follaje de nacedero (Trichantera gigantea) como suplemento protéico en dietas de jugo de caña para cerdas gestantes. In: Reporte de investigación (CIPAV, Julio 1989)
Mena A 1984 Jugo de canña de azucar y otros recursos tropicales para la alimentación de cerdos. Informe Provisional No.16. IFS:Stockholm
Orskov E R, Hovell F D DeB and Mould F 1980 The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Tropical Animal Production 5:195-213
Posso L and Preston T R 1989 Desarrollo de sistemas alimenticios en aves basados en el jugo de la caña en la alimentacion avicola. In: Memorias del I Seminario-Taller Internacional Sistemas Intensivos para la Producción Animal en el Trópico. (Editors: Susana López, Mauricio Rosales and T R Preston) CIPAV: Cali, Colombia
Ramchurn R 1978 New food resources for rabbits in Mauritius. Provisional Report. No. 14. IFS: Stockolm.
Solarte A and Preston T R 1989 La granja intensiva familiar con base en la caña de azucar y los arboles forrajeros. In: Memorias del I Seminario-Taller Internacional Sistemas Intensivos para la Producción Animal en el Trópico: (Editors: Susana López, Mauricio Rosales and T R Preston) CIPAV: Cali, Colombia